Digital Brouhaha

I can’t believe people are still talking about the digital divide, y’all — for realz!

Back in the early aughts, organizations that served communities—communities otherwise delegated to the margins—kicked off funding efforts to get their “populations” access to ever advancing and “essential” technology. People feared a generation might go through life lacking proficiency with computers, smartphones, the internet, and all the exigent shit more privileged folks have. I mean, heaven forbid, right?

I’m not a very skeptical person. Many would describe me as a sap—a downright mark. Approached with a personal story (sob or inspirational) or a good cause, I’m a true believer—I’m all in. I’m the person who nearly joined a cult, remember? I may play devil’s advocate, but I’m not naturally inclined to be a cynic just for the sake of cynicism. In my mature years, I’ve come to loathe contempt prior to investigation.

That shifts when large sums of cash are involved. This is the case with multimillion dollar not-for-profit outfits (and I ain’t talking fashion). At extremes, I think the whole thing is a racket to sell poor people to rich people—people whose poverty make all that wealth possible. The wealthy demonstrate their concern (not remorse) by funding programs to aid the less fortunate.

A condition of privileged generosity is that those funders then get to decide what causes are worthy of their money. Not-for-profits then must song and dance for grants to continue serving, while getting to prioritize who gets served. I am aware I’m speaking from the position of a not-for-profit manager who has participated in the charade.

Tech companies are subsidized by taxpayer dollars via money donated to ensure even under-resourced households have flat screens and smartphones. We could instead be aiming for less tech dependence. In “Tools for Conviviality” Ivan Illich makes the argument for maintaining technology standards (including low-tech and no tech) that don’t automatically disenfranchise people who opt not to be so cutting edge. That’s the conversation I wanna see pop off. Might we fund a way to get free from our iPhones, please?

Pink Flowers

Pink Flowers is a Black trans artist, peacemaker, educator, and pleasure activist whose work lives at the intersection of embodiment, governance, and cultural transformation. Trained in Theater of the Oppressed, Art of Hosting, and Navajo-informed Peacemaking practices, Pink designs spaces where conflict can be addressed, power can be examined, and joy can be reclaimed.

Her artistic and pedagogical practice draws from African trickster cosmology, Brazilian Joker traditions, shamanic ritual, and cooperative economics. She is the founder of the award-winning Falconworks Theater Company (2005–2021), which used popular theater to build civic capacity and participatory leadership in historically marginalized communities.

Pink served for over five years as a trained Peacemaker in the Red Hook Community Justice Center in Brooklyn, facilitating restorative processes within the New York City court system. From 2015–2018, she worked in cooperative business development with the Center for Family Life, supporting worker-owned enterprises in immigrant communities.

She currently serves as Director of Education and Training for the Inter-Cooperative Council in Ann Arbor, where she leads leadership development and conflict engagement initiatives. Her work has been presented nationally and internationally, including at the Stretch Festival in Berlin and the Pedagogy and Theatre of the Oppressed Conference.

Across ritual, performance, mediation, and institutional design, Pink’s work asks a central question:

What becomes possible when we refuse shame and choose conscious power instead?

Previous
Previous

Dave Chappelle’s Trans Faux Pas

Next
Next

Dear Evan Hanson: A Review